Here we will explore what a blockchain is, what decentralized philosophy is, what coordination and collusion are, as well as free speech, the new buzz word in-morality, and credible neutrality. Then explore blockchain use cases.
What is a blockchain? In theory, it is a decentralized ledger system that reconciles books and solves the Byzantine Generals problem. In practice, it is a link of old information to new information. In Bitcoin the blockchain system creates a new block every 10 minutes. This new block mints 3.125 new Bitcoins along with the new block. The block contains a summary (or hash) of all the previous transactions. It then links into the next, and thus, a link of blocks that are chained together, is a blockchain!
Blockchain is designed to beat the Byzantine general’s problem. In it we have a group of generals surrounding a city, but the city is so large they cannot communicate when to attack. So, by giving a set of rules that can use cryptography and then be verified, a central ledger is developed, from multiple different inputs. For example, a bunch of miners verify transactions, then the fastest and best miner gets to add the transactions to everyone’s blockchain and collects his 3.125 Bitcoins as a reward. This form of decentralization facilitates communication and negates collusion. Collusion and communication are in this case, very dicey definitions we must pay attention to, and the devil is in the details! The Proof-of-Work could be considered collusion if 2 generals decide to wait, and game the system, having everyone else do the hard work before them and then attack later and sweep in for a seedy victory. By including where every coin has been this becomes quite difficult. It makes the network more secure.
So, we can think of the blockchain as a bunch of lettuce farms. If there is one central farm, or in this case one central server, or representative, it is easy to break into and steal lettuce. If the farms are located around the county, however, this becomes very hard. This is why, during the trucker’s freedom convoy in Canada, the truckers should have been paid in Bitcoin, not in fait currency that the government froze. It would be almost impossible to freeze these accounts in Bitcoin. The truckers could communicate their dreams freely, the government would not be able to sensor them or otherwise collude to force a halt to the trucker’s progress, and Bitcoin could have gotten famous! By preventing collusion we could have made money!
On Collusion
So, what is considered collusion? If the government filters your feed, social media, and news is that collusion of the government to try and slant yours, societies, and T.Vs, objective perspective? Most definitely! See free speech and open democracies across the world on this one. We would begin our argument to say where there is filters and censorship there is collusion. Collusion is where one party tries to game the system possibly at the expense of another. If the government does not get you access to legitimate information that must be collusion to slant your view. So, the government may claim it is legitimately trying to protect the public or some mockery, through censorship they are colluding and doing no favors.
Government contracts are also a target for collusion. In the military, health and prison systems capitalism has begun to choke on the fat in these industries. There seems to be no room for the humble little guy and it’s all about who can pay the most. The logic is that if I don’t pay a bribe the next guy will. This also happens in the DAO voting structures online now days. Votes are bought or bullied from legitimate coin holders. To tell the whole story, the process should be based on your own merit and not the systems. We dream of the day when nice guys get dates too! Then there are some who would argue more money is better, but we must ask where is this money coming from and to whom does it go to and why. Perhaps our funds could be better spent elsewhere and more effectively. Instead of a fat cat we should have many nice little princes. Making it on your own merit means independence regardless of if you are a King. It also means decentralization and curious investigation.
Don’t make assumptions, be an individual and do the math, don’t take the bait, that is what blockchain is about. For example, some may think it’s a perfect system to have a forum where people get voted to the top based on popularity. Equitable and distributed. There is nothing more fun than destroying U.N vetoes with a popular vote. If each post made money based on the up votes it gets we could super charge our forum. The money could come from advertisers, or investors who think the platform will grow. If a hacker then colludes to buy upvotes for 80 cents on the dollar he can then claim the top spot and make 20 percent. But, what about the little guy who cannot afford to buy votes to get to the top? You have to think this way and say there has to be recourse and checks and balances, it’s the nature of effective power. We have to take money out and put in individual merit, possibly with a neutral Dragons Den like middleman or forum operator; however, remember moderators are a central point to attack and can be corrupted and have the power to collude at a certain point.
Additionally, we must also consider exactly what is begin colluded on. We hate to give collusion recourse, but sometimes collusion is not collusion at all. And thus, we are left with definitions and proof. Let us say that in our forum a hacker creates false votes and also pays off the site admin (who should not exist in a perfectly decentralized blockchain system), to put his post about how to speak French at the top. The means to get there were collusion of sorts, but his endgame was to help people learn French, not too bad right? So maybe he gets a second shot.
We must ask why is this happening and what are the motives? It is said that there was once a man who memorized the whole New Testament. He traveled the whole world promoting it. Yet, God sent him to hell because he only did it for himself; to gain fame and recognition. There are also those who are pious because it makes them feel better of themselves, which is fine, but true love of God is in some cases hands free, and they expect something out of it. Alcoholics Anonymous turn to God because it is good, you should not turn to God because people told you to do so. You should not use God as a crutch, you should do things for God instead. The idea is not what my country can do for me, but what I can do for my country. Thus, there is the story of the Bodhisattva practicing to reach enlightenment. He studies all the teachings, did all the yoga but made no progress. Why? Perhaps he was practicing for himself and not practice. It is crazy how dedicated Buddhists are to dedication. Finally, at the end of one long day as he went to go to sleep he said essentially “screw it.” And then attained enlightenment just before his head hit the pillow. He transcended himself and the system and became enlightened, as the story goes. Thus, we must watch the system carefully, with one eye on us, and one on what is being done. Our motto is stick it to the system.
The system is ripe for and with collusion and censorship, that is why we have cryptocurrency. First of all, if we kill someone it is murder; if the system kills someone it can be rationalized away or considered war. Of course, we must admit during a war you generally agree to kill each other, but still it’s a slight dystopian structure anyway. Then we must also consider Christ himself. When he was in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights he was tempted by the Devil. What did the Devil say to him? He said “If you bow down and worship me I will give to you all the kingdoms of the earth.” Because that is the level of consciousness the Devil can work on, collective society, the system. Each individual soul belongs to that soul or Christ so ultimately Christ told him to beat it saying in response “Get away Satan! It is written: The Lord, your God, shall you worship and him alone shall you serve.” So, he will not worship Satan, worship himself by having others worship him and not worship God, or worship society or kingdoms in place of God. So just so you know, there is Jesus coin for those of you looking to spread some good.
Side Point:
However, one point of contention was that Jesus said “not to test the lord thy God.” However, we find this test important. Especially in the crypto sphere we must test all we know. God may be in everything but not everything is in God, because the world is unfair. In Hinduism, however, there is an important counter argument called the dance of shiva. This is where God, delights in hiding himself from himself, and then revealing himself. Thus, you must go through the hoops to find God, and it is no longer just God, but becomes the One True God though tests. Thus, at the end of the day, ultimately the world is not a test it is a lesson. A universal message, a second chance, as the story goes.
If the lord Buddha appears when needed, so to should God, and that is something we take on faith. If you lay a trap to prove Gods existence or connection to man, he may make you work it out alone. If you doubt God he will correct you, if you test him he may leave you; it all depends on the circumstance, we are about transcending circumstance and in transcending circumstance you will find true freedom and entrepreneurship.
We also love what Snoop Dogg said about the violence inherent in gang culture. His argument was that we are just passing through and the violence is inherent in the system, not in man’s soul, so we must upgrade. The system might be a reflection of man’s soul, but we can do better than that; again Snoop reflects and says if you get rid of the guns, the drugs, the money, the women, what are you left with? A pure soul. We also like what the Dalai Llama did. Mao came to his door peddling war. He said “we can give you roads, society, culture and liberate your people.” To which the Dalai Llama responded, “I can only liberate myself.” This is a wise and responsible spiritual answer, but it is also telling Mao to screw off. Thus, we must be wary of what society is doing and its various wheelings and dealings and practice hard.
This hard practice should get you behind the curtain. People try to pull it over your eyes all the time. We would say collusion is where one uses knowledge you don’t know about to get an upper hand. This is what sooth sayers (and investment gurus) do all the time. They use voodoo and mysticism to claim they are wiser than the King and use this to serve their purpose. Thus, it is better to be down to earth, technical, and cynical. It is true Rasputin used opium and magic to get the upper hand on Nicolas Romanov. Luckly sooth sayers can’t fool us all, there are those who share information and those who hoard it for a high price. In the crypto currency sphere, we are in the 20/20 vision and transparency camp. Obviously the only one who can tell you your future is you. Don’t let anyone use their superior knowledge to get to you, just do a google search. We work with Kings all the time, their duty should be to their humble subjects and not their vanity, the illuminati, opium, magic, or a legitimate university degree from superstition united.
Collusions also happens in capitalism; people are afraid of competition, so they forcefully collude. Companies may band together to rig prices on gas. This is not stable and not recommended by the book. Technically, these colluders should be communicating with the people about the true nature of capitalism. They could lower their prices, and be more down to earth, to let others in and communicate a more equitable and distributed narrative. This includes letting all people into all positions as with diversity, equity, and inclusion; these are the dues one must pay to communicate a higher form of expression in capitalist art. You must get off the rigged bandwagon and get on the creative one.
Therefore, in summary everyone must pay their dues, or get off the hook, the question is what dues? In this decentralized capitalist regime movement, we would say you must pay your dues to maintain hands free and educated government, society and people. Hands off government and hands on intelligence. This includes being wary of conspiracies. No one wants to think they are in one, but they might be, and by then it may be too late. It is thus important to second guess, investigate, and think of the people and those who may benefit or be hurt from progresses march, or any form of collusion.
On Decentralization
Decentralization and free speech directly destroy the root causes of collusion. If you take out a King and censorship collusion dies; If you take out censorship and a King you get free speech. Decentralization opens the door, free speech confirms it and blockchain supports it. Collusion doesn’t want you to talk about it, but you must use your free speech instead. We will put it out in the open, on the other hand, sometimes people just want to cheat.
So, what is the best type of system? Is it a kingdom, communism, or democracy? Imagine we have a feudal kingdom of Glens taxis. If there was a King based system, the King would buy all the taxis, require taxes to be paid (that would probably be hefty) and crush competition. If we did away with that we would be left with a form of anarchy. All your taxis would be local. They would only go to the taxis they know, locally. To destroy this system a wiser rider would share his fares though the various fiefdoms, knowing everyone is human. Obviously, the wild fiefdoms may also be prone to war with one another. The best system would be a decentralized one. Where money was pooled, shared, and each rider owned his own taxi! We could have an insurance company collect and divvy out funds and we could buy gas on mass to reduce costs. We can do the math with the insurance company and ensure every driver gets approximately the same hours! This is akin to putting all your eggs (or stocks) into one basket, versus no basket (or stock system), verses your spread-out baskets (or stock investments). There is a better way, and it is decentralization.
On Free Speech
The hippies would say if there is no King (or “The Man”) to tell you how to live your life you are free. To begin our quest, we will take the example of a Bitcoin forum; this is a real-world example and should be quite inspiring. There was a forum where a thread about Bitcoin was being discussed. They were discussing forking Bitcoin into what became Bitcoin Cash. However, the moderator decided to shut down the posts, because they were detrimental to Bitcoin itself, thus destroying free speech. One argument was that this was the forum moderator’s private forum so he can do as he wishes. Another point was that the topic got off hand and was detrimental to the growth of Bitcoin. Yet, as clever forum operators we must consider an alternative. Perhaps there could be a special safe space within the forum where you can say whatever you want. Also, we must acknowledge that in completely open public spaces you must curtail yourself and be careful and reserved with some of your speech for others and for class; this goes for form moderators and participants as well, a balance must be stuck, and usually is.
This was a bit of a problem when Vitalik Buterin, the creator of Ethereum, was at a large Bitcoin conference. There was someone there claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin. Vitalik did not like this. So as the story goes Vitalik shouted him down. Then the community came after Buterin as he “censored” the other guys “free speech.” Free speech which comes from a place of responsibility, to start. However, Vitalik would not confess his transgression, he fought back. He said that at such a conference there is only so much time, and this guy was limiting it with too much focus on himself. Wise enough. But we thought Vitalik could also have said, “I heard you out, your opinion didn’t measure up, so I shouted at you.” These things do happen. In our next example we will look at conspiracy theory forums and how to turn conspiracies into wisdom as well as lessons from being avid fans of the show Survivor.
First, this part of the Manifesto is for learning purposes only and not intended to harm. It began on the hit TV show Survivor with long term contestant Jeff Varner an apparent advocate of LGBTQ rights. Then he ironically outed Zeke Smith as being transgender and gay. God only knows how he figured this out, we had no idea. This led to tears, fears, and Varner’s exit without a vote. It has been said you can’t out anyone for any reason, especially on T.V. Then came the controversial book deal “surviving shame” was the title as Varner says. Some said this was his coming to terms, teaching and learning, others thought it a shameful money grab and odd selfish crutch. As a disclaimer the debates then began. We were in the let it die and what planet was he on camp. Online one post said essentially that if you accuse Varner you are just as bad as he is. Let us unpack this argument. It is trying to end shame by using shame. Which is hypocritical. It uses hate and blame to try and force you to do the right thing. It is essentially the same old shit wrapped in gold. It is a perpetual blame game trying not to blame. It also has a smell of holier than though logic. Additionally, this argument is teaching you not to be critical! Thus, our let it die strategy meant, no book, learn all you can, seek reconciliation, do it for Zeke. Who remained quite honorable through the whole ordeal and realized: you don’t get money for being a dumb ass. Zeke said he wanted to maintain his distance and forgive Varner from afar. He also said he wanted to be remembered as Zeke the Survivor player not the transgender person. We applaud the moves Zeke has made and the life he has created for himself. And his marriage. We underline the purpose here is education, and promotion of our favorite show, Survivor. For wisdom to come to fruition you need to look to obscure places and that is exactly what we plan do with conspiracy theory forums.
Once upon a time we would frequent a forum known as Above Top Seret.com. UFO’s, cryptozoology, conspiracies, and ancient aliens. All the good stuff. They also have the political mud pit where you can say literally anything. How do you approach such an eye-opening site? Generally, all the conspiracy related stuff was known to be watched by the CIA with counterintelligence officers and not to mention all the crazies. So then in the political mud pits you can say really anything, thus just by saying you like Trump you could be accosted by 50 well-read academics and 25 crazies. What one must learn as Jesus put it is “To take everything with a grain of salt.” This means to be critical and tasty. To have a thick skin and to ask questions you know will be asked of you! This coordinates procedures between the individuals on the site and the site itself.
On Coordination
What is true coordination? True coordination is democratic, open and effective. Coordination destroys collusion. We will use the example of a job. If you have flexibility in your job you are well coordinated with your employer. You get vacation days. Although flexibility in blockchain hierarchy is a no no; flexibility on earth is a great asset and lets you interface and coordinate with others, instead of being a ridged square. If you have the ability to rebel, you and your employer have a good relationship and are coordinated. If you keep your guns you did well. If, however, the government squashes you like they did the Canadian freedom trucker convoy, there is no coordination, and the system is failing you. The system is playing out a conspiracy without even knowing what a conspiracy is. True coordination takes you beyond yourself. Coordination can destroy racism. If you don’t know what racism is, it is centralization of a single viewpoint. It is police brutality; it is a rigged media. Coordination can stop this.
What is more is that according to blockchain philosophy there has to be reconciliation and diversity for coordination to grow. This is also what a real media is about. In blockchain reconciliation is for all the miners to have the same ledger at the end of the day and diversity is for the use of the Bitcoin system around the world! In the media reconciliation is used to break difficult stories and diversity is about the reporters themselves, their stories, as well as their audience. Somewhere along the line people forgot about this and wanted their information to come from a central, trusted, infallible source, the King! Bitcoin does not like this. What ever happened to independent journalism and a free press? It is what the founding fathers died for. They knew absolute power corrupts absolutely. Thus, the process should be democratic, diverse, and based on reconciliation. The media can do this for many parties. If there is a story about sludge being put into our drinking water, it could lead to reconciliation down the road. If you remember in Canada a large story broke about residential schools mistreating Indian youth who were taken away from their native tribe. Kill the Indian save the man. This was done because the King thought it was a good idea. This story will eventually lead to reconciliation in this tale and many more after it. Good media can effectively expose stories and change their outcomes. The natives now want “truth and reconciliation.” Which is not that far from reconciliation and diversity to start with. If we live by these ideals there won’t be a King or residential schools. We need diversity in our media, and we need to use it for reconciliation of stories and society. Too much information going one way becomes collusion, a little trickle from everywhere is wisdom, just ask a spy. Since day one we need to do better and have a championship belt and the ability to cater to the many small princes and not just the King. We need more people at the table, and they need to be vigilant. This leads to credible neutrality and our own invention, in-morality, the new next sectors of our experiment.
Truly in-morality and credible neutrality are cousins. An in-moral person looks at the world and says you have half the people believing A the rest believing B, so we are all screwed. An in-moral person is cynical and critical. An in-moral person is outside of the system. For example, we saw a forum thread where someone once said “I get to listen to Taylor Swift after I have dropped all the homies off!” This set off an explosion. People thought it is your car why don’t you play your music? Or, why are you being such a tool around your friends? Or, why isn’t your car democratic or a dictatorship and so on? The storm had no end. So, what are we left with? A true in-moral person would, once again, realize reconciliation and diversity. If we are to take the example of a fugitive, Jesse James, in the wild west we can complete our story. Perhaps he has a $5,000 reward dead or alive. If you are a simple moral person in the general populace and see Jesse James you must report him or attempt to kill him or bring him in. If you are in Jesse James’ posse, the opposite is true, you must never turn him in. If you are an in-moral person however, you would say to Jesse James, “ok I saw you, maybe for $500 I will forget that I did!” Thus, an in-moral person practices reconciliation and diversity perfectly in this example. The cynical and critical viewpoint has come full circle to be wisdom and correct practice. It is also exciting and worth of a story, even if it is based in bribery. If there was only one viewpoint on these issues life would be quite boring. The in-moral person is also open to the possibility that Jesse James is innocent and doesn’t believe they know everything, they are humble. In a democracy you can do what you want to do, and this leads us to one of the pillars of democracy, credible neutrality in the wild west.
On Credible Neutrality
If you would say credible neutrality is a veto power you might just blow our minds. Credible neutrality kills the rat race, the debate, and sees the whole world. It is simple and it has to be earned. It serves no side. If people are debating about slavery in America and you used a veto to destroy the issue you might just be hitting into credible neutrality and coming full circle. But really, credible neutrality also has to see and consider all things. Additionally, credible neutrality does not mean doing nothing; it means proof of process. In the blockchain sphere this is done by Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake systems. Really, a wise scribe is the most credibly neutral as long as you know who he is and that he is dedicated to his position. To translate this, he may be more concerned with dedication over his own desire.
Credible neutrality is found in math and transcends addiction. I t’s also found in being more creative than the status quo. You already know how this is going to go so you decide to add your genius opinion. Credible neutrality is also found after the fact. The decision has been made, and unfortunately, you have to go with it. You are not a rebel you are credibly neutral to the current liberal party. Thus, credible neutrality fights extremism.
Regardless of the important lines in the sand, a credibly neutral monk with no political view once said “No one can live your life except you. No one can live my life except me. You are responsible. I am responsible. But what is our life? What is our death?” – Taizan Maezumi Roshi. In this case our life is responsibility, dedication and respect. Our life should take us beyond A or B. Our life should be up to us. Our life should be curious and question authority. Our life should give others space, our life should connect the genius, the Forrest Gump and preserve the box of chocolates. We can expand democracy and always be home. We can live fast and blame it on our youth. We can uplift all of the expectations of our parents. Then the next part in this quote we must consider is, what is our death? This means to leave behind the past and path, for others. In this quote our death also means we can not put our views onto other people, it is their life. Much like Star trek we must not interfere and inject the revolution naturally and responsibly. We can show you the trophy, but you must grab it! We must let addiction, collusion, greed, and censorship die. We must live with reconciliation and diversity and let centralization die. We must alternate between work and play and forget about jealousy, we must do it for the next generation. This book is designed for you, we do it so we can take simple, small steps toward a new future and enlightenment for all. Essentially one would do it for yourself, the audience, God and simply to do it! We will explore these platforms in more detail, and see what is wrong and positive with each.
First, if you do it for yourself you may at first seem selfish. Your operations may not conform with the wider reality around you. You may be out of touch with cultural roots and living a highly subjective life. You may lack objective perspective and be forcing others to conform to you. We don’t like conformity at all. Also, you may not be responsible and seem childish. You may also prioritize poorly putting money before family. Your failures may weigh heavily on your mind, and you may take things too seriously. If you attempt to open a door people will ask about your intentions. If you hit yourself in the face opening a door for yourself you seem foolish, if you hit yourself in the face opening the door for another you may seem to have some class.
Second one can do what they do for the audience. Although it is great to be a performer if you do it for the audience you may find you are doing the same routines over and over! You will be at the whim of trends and the moment. Also, if you base your personal image on the thoughts of others you will be at their mercy and seem needy. You may fear the judgment of the audience. One contestant on the hit TV show Alone thought she was a great hunter and wanted to show it to the world. However, when this did not work out it leads to all kinds of doubts about herself, thus the best route is not to gamble and see the audiences’ support as a blessing and their criticism as inspiring. Thus, one can always transform their circumstances and play God.
Third people will claim to do what they do for God. This is a very slippery slope as you first need to know exactly what God wants. And few of us know that. Then one would use this argument to say they are always right. The hubris of mankind is far reaching and never ending. We should supplement the debate with the fact that many people use God as a crutch. They want to seem holy. Even Goths want to seem trendy, it is better to rebel and be yourself. Instead of seeking to be flashy seek to care. Seek not to do it for glory but for humanity. The glory will come if you can look into the mirror and change your makeup on the fly. If you freshly approach each day and take what you eventually collect and give it to God and the next generation you might be getting better. Many however do it for Gods name, but not his substance, his glory not his work. There have ben many wars fought in the name of God. We glorify the path and the rebellion. Don’t try and fit in, try to rewrite the standard. Again, it is not what God can do for me, but what I can do for God. Try not to claim anything until it is too late. Wake up early and stay the course and remember, what goes around comes around.
The most purest position is to do things simply to do them. To get better at your craft. The ideal of essentialism states that a good action is done in and of itself, for its self, not for any extenuating circumstances. For example, you open the door for someone because it is the good right thing to do, and not because that person will thank you. The thank you is extenuating circumstances and technically attachment to Karma. This also extends to your sense of self. You are not a prince, that is an extenuating circumstance, you are either good or bad. A nice guy or a player. You are simply connection and don’t care essentially where that connection is coming from, you could be rich or poor. If you do things to do them you will get better and you’re not afraid of failure. You did not do it for God, the audience or yourself. You did it to do it. And in so doing, do so to improve. Essentialism transcends reasons. You just do it. So, they would say murdering is bad, because you don’t murder to murder you murder for reasons. You are not fazed by challenges, you do it exactly because it is challenging! You also are efficient and don’t waste time on frills or fantasy, you are already living your best life because that is reason enough to live it! Of course there are also thousands of other reasons for you to succeed, we are just pointing out the obvious.
We do it for the rebound and the thrill. If you are sad about being sad eventually you will become happy. We aim to kill the robot and instead have you ask new questions. We do it for the technology, the wealth, the wisdom, the freedom and you, all together at once! We aim to transcend circumstances and have a revolution in your life whether you are old or young.
Here there are a lot of definitions, but we hope these words make a difference in your life. It’s not what you have it is what you do with it. So welcome to the blockchain, the decentralized crypto capitalist movement and to free speech, in-morality and credible neutrality. So, what can blockchains do for you?
On Blockchain
What exactly can a blockchain be used for?
To blast information to a network.
By making a log entry from one wallet to another with a message in the app everyone can see what is happening via the blockchain. This could be done for advertising, to find jobs, or be used as an alert.
To give credit and log what someone has done or discovered.
With Steem the blockchain can track your posts and divvy out payment for participation as a result.
To prove copyright.
Scientists can log their findings on a blockchain transparent and for everyone to see, giving credit and proving copyright for the finders. This opens up and links together research, showing the people what progress is happening and crediting the scientists who share their discoveries.
To prove ownership, who owns what and how much.
The blockchain can say these colored coins or tokens belong to Satoshi Nakamoto and in what quantities.
To prove an NFT is real.
The blockchain has an NFT pointed to your wallet so everyone knows it is yours and can be securely traded and verified.
To transfer title from A to B.
A homes title or NFT tokens for a hotel stay can be easily traded and tracked on the blockchain. It says what is owned and who owns it.
To say a product has been shipped and made it from A to B in its journey.
Blockchain can be used for supply chain management and verification of process and where goods come from, fighting counterfeit.
To prove where a good has come from fighting counter fit.
Every good has a log online in the blockchain and in their wallet proving it legitimately came from the factory or creator, for example vintage Louis Vuitton.
To prove you took an action. (Or NFT collected).
If you travel the world to collect Awesome Points or an NFT, the blockchain can say where you were or that you got something done.
To Divvy up work and stamp when it has been completed.
The blockchain can log when a group of workers or students has completed a task, and say when it was done and by whom. We know who did what when, with a time stamp; then releasing a payment or grade.
To Divvy out payment or claims.
We can see who did what or collected the most funds for a DAO and divvy out ownership tokens or funds via a blockchain based on data inputs.
To track game items or NFT tokens.
The blockchain can track your items in a game universe or secure your NFTs.
To track where you have been online.
The blockchain can track where you have been online, giving tips to your favorite websites and blocking ads.
To log procedures such as surgeries or car tune-ups.
Every time some work is done it can be logged on the blockchain and in a wallet. This could be for medical procedures, or a car tune-up.
Used to vote.
We can vote to see who wants to issue more tokens or take a given path.
Used for finance and to divvy up payments.
The Blochian knows you own 50% of an item because it was previously logged. Now when the asset sells you get your part. This can also be done with smart contracts and Multi-signature wallets and tokens.
To prove identity.
If you can transfer real estate title on a blockchain, the government may have IDs implemented on the blockchain as well. With a log from them to you, you could verify your government issued ID is real.
To track and prove past revenue.
You can use the blockchain to log and remember past revenue or events, thus you can help prove a business’s worth and who has claim to what.
To divvy out a percent share of past revenue.
If the blockchain knows you own 50% of a pool of assets, when it sells the blockchain knows and you get your share.
See the depth or velocity of money in Bitcoin and other blockchains.
The blockchain can give you a bird’s eye view of the health of any crypto currency using it.
To track where Jesse James is and has been.
You can use the blockchain to log and prove you have been around the world. Then the blockchain can mint you unique NFTs saying you have been to the Singapore Lion or Tokyo.
We went from collusion, to decentralization, to free speech, coordination to credible neutrality and in-morality to you and what a blockchain can be used for. Thank you for reading this manifesto and hearing about the revolution. If you want to see collusion, conspiracy, internet hype, jaw dropping lawsuits and pure capitalism, check out the GameStop Saga we have explored and see what you would do differently. We would put it all out in the open and have the people versus the big banks. That is exactly where we plan to go next! By giving trades, commissions, fees and spreads to the users we can take on the big banks by creating our own tokens to represent everything from our house to our grandmothers’ antiques. The system is rip for disruption and we plan to do it the best!
